I believe that overall, we worked well as a group. Even though may have had some disagreements and problems with our decisions, we worked quite well together.
We decided that I was to do questions 1 and 2 and along the way, I contributed with the handouts - the close passage section.
I was able to tolerate my group members and what I liked the best when working as a group was the fact that we all cooperated, sort of. We worked on our questions, didn't get in the way of each other and helped each other out. I found it convenient working as a group because I didn't have to complete a workload of research.
Though the group may cooperate and get along, I believe that we didn't actually work as a whole. The work was only done individually (or in individual pairs) and it wasn't until the last lesson that we put the information we collected together, with little time to spare.
I learned that we all have to work as a whole if wanted to get something done. I learned, from using blogs, that I can't just leave my work last minute while my other group members do the same/don't. I learned that we all have to get along, or at least tolerate each other.
As mentioned above, we worked cooperatively; good enough to get our presentation done. Every group member shared the work/contributed equally but perhaps not enthusiastically, myself included.
As an individual, I believe I have done my fair share of the work and that it is up to the rest of the group members to get the work done, as I did. My strengths as a group member is actually completing an adequate amount of research every lesson and not wasting time. My weakness is keeping organised and not knowing how overall the group is going so far.
I believe that some members need to stop procrastinating and actually get their work done so we can finish on time. We need to work more as a group than as individuals stuck with each other.
Other than that, I believe we worked quite well as a group.
